EPTA Annual Conference 1997
The Impact of Parliamentary Technology Assessment
September 25 in Copenhagen, Denmark, 9.30-16.00
Eigtveds Pakhus, Asiatisk Plads 2 G, 1448 Copenhagen
Introduction
There is a growing attention in Europe to technology assessment (TA) as a
tool to keep parliamentarians informed and to encourage public debate on the
challenges of scientific and technical progress. In 1996 the Council of
Europe recommended, that all member states set up TA-bodies. This year the
parliaments of Finland, Italy and Greece have decided to take the step and
are now consequently applying for membership in the European Parliamentary
Technology Assessment Network (EPTA). It seems therefore appropriate to
devote this year's Annual Conference to the following question: What makes
parliamentary technology assessment successful?
The speakers at the conference will address the following issues:
The Impact of Parliamentary Technology Assessment
- What are the aims and objectives
- Ways of measuring output - quality/quantity
- Cases of success - with respect to parliament, media and others
- Examples of failed projects
- Lessons learnt to improve efficiency in parliamentary TA
Final Program
The Impact of Parliamentary Technology Assessment
September 25 in Copenhagen, Denmark, 9.30-16.00
Eigtveds Pakhus, Asiatisk Plads 2 G, 1448 Copenhagen
| 9.00 |
Registration and coffee
|
| 9.30 |
Opening of the conference by Rector, Mr. Henrik Toft
Jensen, chairman of the Danish Board of Technology
|
| 9.40 |
Honorary Speaker: Ms. Jytte Hilden, Danish Minister
of Research and Information Technology
|
| 10.00 |
Director, Mr. Michael Norton, Parliamentary Office
of Science and Technology (POST), Great Britain. Mr. Norton reviews
the aims and objectives of POST, and how they are applied in the UK
parlia-mentary context including case-stories.
|
| 10.30 |
Director, Ms. Josée van Eijndhoven, The Rathenau
Institute, Holland: Technology Assessment in the Netherlands: Between
analysis and support of societal debate. The present mission of the
Rathenau Institute is to contribute to societal debate and political
opinion-forming. Formerly the emphasis was more on analysis.
Consequences of this shift will be discussed: conduction of projects
and criteria to measure quality and success.
|
| 11.00 |
Coffee Break
|
| 11.25 |
Director, Mr. Dick Holdsworth, Scientific and
Technological Options Assessment, (STOA), European Parliament: 'The
objec-tive of quality: a means of promoting the impact of parliamentary
technology assessment at European level'.
|
| 11.55 |
MP, Mr. Claude Birraux, Office Parlamentaire
d'Evaluation des Choix Scientifique et Technologiques (OPECST),
France. Evolution of the parliamentary TA concept in France; continous
adjust-ment of methods and means. The advantages of MP's directly
conducting TA-projects.
|
| 12.25 |
Lunch Break
|
| 13.40 |
Director, Mr. Herbert Paschen, Bureau for Technology
Assessment of the German Bundestag (TAB), Germany. Major points to be
dealt with are the following: Experience with the organisational
model; adaptation of work procedures; using the results af TAB's works
- positive and negative examples; possibilities for improving the
usefulness af TAB.
|
| 14.10 |
Director, Mr. Lars Klüver, The Danish Board of
Technology, Denmark. Parliamentary TA and the choice of methodology,
the neverending story of picking the right tool for a particular task.
|
| 14.40 |
Coffee Break
|
| 15.05 |
General discussion
|
| 16.00 |
End of conference
|
Back to document index
|